Criticism of the National Health Service (England)

페이지 정보

작성자 Hortense 작성일25-06-21 00:32 조회1회 댓글0건

본문

cropped-Spectra-Plain-Landscape-Logo-Navy-e1714036142667-1024x251.png

Criticism of the National Health Service (England) includes concerns such as access, waiting lists, health care coverage, and numerous scandals. The National Health Service (NHS) is the openly financed healthcare system of England, developed under the National Health Service Act 1946 by the post-war Labour federal government of Clement Attlee. It has actually come under much criticism, specifically throughout the early 2000s, due to break outs of antibiotic resistant infections such as MRSA and Clostridioides difficile infection, waiting lists, and medical scandals such as the Alder Hey organs scandal. However, the involvement of the NHS in scandals extends back several years, consisting of over the provision of psychological healthcare in the 1970s and 1980s (ultimately part of the reason for the Mental Health Act 1983), and overspends on hospital newbuilds, including Guy's Hospital Phase III in London in 1985, the expense of which shot up from ₤ 29 million to ₤ 152 million. [1]

Access controls and waiting lists

ATF-logo-BLK-768x245.png

In making health care a largely "invisible expense" to the client, healthcare seems to be successfully free to its consumers - there is no specific NHS tax or levy. To minimize costs and guarantee that everyone is dealt with equitably, there are a variety of "gatekeepers." The family doctor (GP) operates as a primary gatekeeper - without a referral from a GP, it is typically difficult to gain higher of treatment, such as a visit with a specialist. These are argued to be required - Welshman Bevan noted in a 1948 speech in the House of Commons, "we shall never ever have all we need ... expectations will always go beyond capability". [2] On the other hand, the nationwide medical insurance systems in other countries (e.g. Germany) have given with the requirement for recommendation; direct access to an expert is possible there. [3]

There has been issue about opportunistic "health tourists" taking a trip to Britain (mainly London) and utilizing the NHS while paying absolutely nothing. [4] British people have been known to take a trip to other European nations to benefit from lower costs, and since of a fear of hospital-acquired very bugs and long waiting lists. [5]

NHS gain access to is for that reason managed by medical priority instead of rate mechanism, leading to waiting lists for both assessments and surgery, as much as months long, although the Labour federal government of 1997-onwards made it among its essential targets to reduce waiting lists. In 1997, the waiting time for a non-urgent operation could be two years; there were ambitions to lower it to 18 weeks regardless of opposition from doctors. [6] It is objected to that this system is fairer - if a medical grievance is severe and lethal, a client will reach the front of the line rapidly.

Living-wage-logo-1.jpeg

The NHS measures medical need in regards to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), a method of measuring the advantage of medical intervention. [7] It is argued that this method of designating health care indicates some clients need to lose in order for others to get, which QALY is a crude method of making life and death decisions. [8]

Hospital obtained infections


There have actually been several deadly break outs of antibiotic resistant germs (" very bugs") in NHS healthcare facilities, such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Clostridioides difficile infection. [9] This has actually led to criticism of requirements of health across the NHS, with some clients purchasing personal health insurance or taking a trip abroad to avoid the perceived threat of catching a "incredibly bug" while in healthcare facility. However, the department of health vowed ₤ 50 million for a "deep tidy" of all NHS England healthcare facilities in 2007. [10]

Coverage


The lack of accessibility of some treatments due to their viewed bad cost-effectiveness sometimes leads to what some call a "postcode lottery". [11] [12] The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) are the first gatekeeper, and take a look at the cost efficiency of all drugs. Until they have released assistance on the expense and efficiency of new or expensive medications, treatments and treatments, NHS services are not likely to offer to money courses of treatment. The very same of real of the Scottish Medicines Consortium, NICE's counterpart in Scotland. [13]

There has actually been significant debate about the public health funding of expensive drugs, notably Herceptin, due to its high expense and viewed restricted general survival. The campaign waged by cancer patients to get the government to pay for their treatment has gone to the highest levels in the courts and the Cabinet to get it licensed. [14] [15] Your Home of Commons Health Select Committee criticised some drug companies for generating drugs that cost on and around the ₤ 30,000 limitation that is thought about the optimum worth of one QALY in the NHS.


Private Finance Initiative


Before the concept of personal finance effort (PFI) pertained to prominence, all new medical facility structure was by convention funded from the Treasury, as it was thought it was best able to raise money and able to manage public sector expense. In June 1994, the Capital Investment Manual (CIM) was released, setting out the regards to PFI contracts. The CIM made it clear that future capital jobs (structure of brand-new centers) needed to look at whether PFI was more suitable to utilizing public sector funding. By the end of 1995, 60 relatively little jobs had been prepared for, at an overall expense of around ₤ 2 billion. Under PFI, buildings were constructed and serviced by the economic sector, and after that leased back to the NHS. The Labour government elected under Tony Blair in 1997 accepted PFI projects, thinking that public costs needed to be cut. [16]

Under the personal financing effort, an increasing number of health centers have been built (or rebuilt) by economic sector consortia, although the government likewise encouraged economic sector treatment centres, so called "surgicentres". [17] There has actually been significant criticism of this, with a research study by a consultancy business which works for the Department of Health showing that for every ₤ 200 million spent on privately funded healthcare facilities the NHS loses 1000 medical professionals and nurses. The very first PFI health centers consist of some 28% less beds than the ones they replaced. [18] Along with this, it has actually been noted that the return for building and construction business on PFI agreements might be as high as 58%, and that in financing hospitals from the private instead of public sector cost the NHS nearly half a billion pounds more every year. [19]

Scandals


Several high-profile medical scandals have actually taken place within the NHS for many years, such as the Alder Hey organs scandal and the Bristol heart scandal. At Alder Hey Children's Hospital, there was the unauthorised elimination, retention, and disposal of human tissue, including children's organs, between 1988 and 1995. The official report into the occurrence, the Redfern Report, revealed that Dick van Velzen, the Chair of Foetal and Infant Pathology at Alder Hey, had actually ordered the "unethical and prohibited removing of every organ from every kid who had had a postmortem." In reaction, it has been argued that the scandal brought the problem of organ and tissue contribution into the public domain, and highlighted the advantages to medical research that result. [20] The Gosport War Memorial Hospital scandal of the 1990s concerned opioid deaths. [21]

The Stafford Hospital scandal in Stafford, England in the late 2000s worried abnormally high mortality rates among patients at the medical facility. [22] [23] Up to 1200 more patients passed away in between 2005 and 2008 than would be expected for the type and size of hospital [24] [25] based upon figures from a death design, but the final Healthcare Commission report concluded it would be misinforming to connect the inadequate care to a particular number or range of numbers of deaths. [26] A public questions later on revealed multiple instances of disregard, incompetence and abuse of patients. [27]

" Lack of self-reliance of inspecting for security and physical fitness for purpose"


Unlike in Scotland and Wales which have degenerated healthcare, NHS England is operated on behalf of the taxpayer by the UK Parliament and the Department of Health, at the head of which is the Secretary of State for Health.


The group charged in England and Wales with checking if the care delivered by the NHS is really safe and in shape for function is the Care Quality Commission, or CQC. Although the CQC describes itself as the "independent regulator of all health and social care services in England" [1], it remains in fact "responsible to the public, Parliament and the Secretary of State for Health." [2] Archived 31 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine and much of its funding comes from the taxpayer. At least one chairman, one president [3] and a board member [4] of the CQC have been singled out for attention by a UK Secretary of State for Health.


There is therefore the capacity for a dispute of interest, as both the NHS and the CQC have the same management and both are extremely vulnerable to political interference.


In April 2024, Health Secretary Victoria Atkins advised NHS England to prioritize evidence and security in gender dysphoria treatment following concerns raised by the Cass Review. NHS required cooperation from adult clinics and started an evaluation, with Labour supporting evidence-based care. Momentum criticized constraints on gender-affirming care, while Stonewall welcomed the evaluation's focus on children's well-being. [28] [29]

See likewise


National Health Service
List of medical facilities in England
Healthcare in the United Kingdom
Private Finance Initiative
Care Quality Commission


Notes


^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "TCSR 07 - Health: The General Public Expects". theinformationdaily.com. 24 September 2007. Archived from the initial on 22 August 2014. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Schneider, Antonius; Donnachie, Ewan; Tauscher, Martin; Gerlach, Roman; Maier, Werner; Mielck, Andreas; Linde, Klaus; Mehring, Michael (9 June 2016). "Costs of collaborated versus uncoordinated care in Germany: results of a regular data analysis in Bavaria". BMJ Open. 6 (6 ): e011621. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-011621. PMC 4908874. PMID 27288386.
^ "Tougher rules to ensure that people do not abuse NHS services". Medical News Today. 26 April 2004. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Health travelers might get refund". BBC News Online. 7 December 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Jones, George (21 February 2007). "Doctors attack Blair's waiting list promise". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 25 February 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)". National Library for Health. March 2006. Archived from the initial on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "So what is a QALY?". Bandolier. Archived from the initial on 15 April 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Do healthcare facilities make you sick?". BBC News. 31 January 2019.
^ "Hospital deep cleaning under fire". 14 January 2008.
^ "NHS 'postcode lotto'". politics.co.uk. 9 August 2006. Archived from the initial on 7 September 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Why some drugs are not worth it". BBC News. 9 March 2005. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Cancer drug rejected for NHS use". BBC News Online. 9 July 2007. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Q&A: The Herceptin judgement". BBC News. 12 April 2006. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ "Update on Herceptin appraisal". National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Archived from the original on 13 December 2006. Retrieved 1 December 2006.
^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "New generation surgery-centres to carry out thousands more NHS operations every year". Department of Health. 3 December 2002. Archived from the initial on 5 March 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ George Monbiot (10 March 2002). "Private Affluence, Public Rip-Off". The Spectator. Retrieved 7 September 2006.
^ PublicFinance.co.uk. "PFI healthcare facilities 'costing NHS extra ₤ 480m a year'". Retrieved 3 December 2014.
^ Dixon, B. (19 March 2001). "Checks and balances required for organ retention". Current Biology. 11 (5 ): R151 - R152. Bibcode:2001 CBio ... 11. R151D. doi:10.1016/ S0960-9822( 01 )00078-1. PMID 11267877.
^ "Gosport hospital deaths: Police corruption probe flawed, watchdog states". BBC News. 14 October 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
^ Nick Triggle (6 February 2013). "Stafford Hospital: Hiding errors 'should be criminal offense'". BBC. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Robert Francis QC (6 February 2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Report). House of Commons. ISBN 9780102981476. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Smith, Rebecca (18 March 2009). "NHS targets 'might have caused 1,200 deaths' in Mid-Staffordshire". London: The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 9 November 2010.
^ Emily Cook (18 March 2009). "Stafford medical facility scandal: As much as 1,200 may have passed away over "stunning" patient care". Daily Mirror. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
^ "The number of individuals passed away "unnecessarily" at Mid Staffs". Full Fact. 7 March 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
^ Sawer, Patrick; Donnelly, Laura (2 October 2011). "Boss of scandal-hit health center leaves interrogation". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the initial on 3 October 2011.
^ "Minister informs NHS to 'end culture of secrecy' on gender care as focus shifts to adult clinics". Morning Star. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
^ "NHS England need to end 'culture of secrecy' in kids's gender care". The National. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
References


Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.


External links


NHS.


Further reading


Pollock, Allyson (2004 ). NHS plc: the privatisation of our healthcare. Verso. ISBN 1-84467-539-4.
Mandelstam, Michael (2006 ). Betraying the NHS: Health Abandoned. Jessica Kingsley Publishing. ISBN 1-84310-482-2.

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.